Business

US Aims for Game-Changing ‘Handshake’ with China at London Trade Talks Amid City Takeover Frenzy – Live Updates

US hoping for ‘handshake’ from China at London trade talks; takeover flurry in the City – as it happened – The Guardian

As global markets brace for a pivotal week,all eyes turned to London,where high-stakes trade talks between the United States and China unfolded against a backdrop of political tension and financial uncertainty. Washington arrived at the negotiating table seeking not a grand bargain but a symbolic breakthrough – a modest “handshake” that could signal a thaw in relations after months of tariff threats, strategic rivalry and fractured diplomacy.

Inside the City of London, however, a very different kind of deal-making was under way. A surge of takeover activity rippled through the capital’s financial hub, as bidders circled undervalued UK assets and boardrooms weighed the risks and rewards of selling up in an era of volatile currencies and shifting regulatory regimes. Together, the diplomatic choreography in London’s conference rooms and the corporate manoeuvres in the Square Mile offered a snapshot of an economy – and a world order – in flux.

This article tracks the day’s developments as they happened: from cautious overtures between Washington and Beijing to the sudden flurry of M&A announcements in the City, and what both reveal about the balance of power in global trade and finance.

US seeks symbolic breakthrough with China at London trade talks amid mounting geopolitical strains

Behind the closed doors of the London summit, Washington is not chasing a sweeping reset so much as a photo-ready moment of détente – a carefully choreographed gesture that suggests rivalry can coexist with dialogue. US negotiators are said to be pushing for a brief joint appearance, a “handshake moment” that markets and diplomats alike can interpret as proof that lines of communication remain open despite disputes over technology, security and trade imbalances. Officials acknowledge that structural tensions are here to stay, but argue that a visible display of civility could help cool rhetoric on both sides and steady jittery investors.

For Beijing,any public gesture carries its own calculus,weighed against domestic narratives of resilience and global ambitions that increasingly diverge from Washington’s. Chinese delegates have signalled they want respect for what they call “core interests” in return for even modest optics. According to people close to the talks, the two sides are exploring low-risk areas of convergence, including:

  • Trade facilitation: smoother customs procedures for key industrial goods
  • Climate cooperation: joint pilot projects in green finance and clean tech
  • Financial stability: enhanced dialogue on currency and debt-market volatility
Issue US Priority China Priority
Tech Exports Limit sensitive chip sales Access to advanced tools
Market Access Fair play for US firms Predictable regulation
Security Protect supply chains Avoid new sanctions

Takeover wave reshapes the City as foreign buyers target undervalued UK assets

Dealmakers poured into London with a zeal not seen as before the pandemic, snapping up listed firms trading at what many analysts view as fire‑sale prices. A weak pound, subdued domestic growth and persistently low valuations relative to US and European peers have turned blue‑chip names and mid‑cap stalwarts into tempting targets for overseas bidders. Bankers describe a market in which private equity and strategic buyers are operating with unusual speed, armed with cheap debt and pressure from investors to deploy capital. Behind the numbers lies a quiet anxiety in boardrooms about the erosion of Britain’s corporate center of gravity, as ownership of household names drifts steadily offshore.

  • Key drivers: depressed share prices, currency advantage, and Brexit‑related uncertainty
  • Main hunters: US private equity, Middle Eastern sovereign funds, and Asian conglomerates
  • Sectors in focus: technology, healthcare, infrastructure, and consumer staples
Sector Typical Premium Main Foreign Buyers
Financial services 20-30% US banks, EU insurers
Technology 30-40% US funds, Asian strategics
Infrastructure 15-25% Global pension funds

City veterans warn that the buying spree is testing the limits of Britain’s relatively open approach to foreign ownership, as ministers rely on the National Security and Investment Act to scrutinise bids in sensitive areas while trying not to scare off capital. Trade unions and some institutional investors are pushing for tougher guarantees on jobs, R&D and listings, amid concerns that more companies could disappear from the London market altogether. For now, though, the balance of power favours the bidders: cash‑rich and increasingly confident that, in a market still shadowed by political and economic uncertainty, UK assets remain both cheap and available.

Regulators and ministers urged to balance open markets with tougher scrutiny of strategic sectors

As London plays host to delicate trade overtures between Washington and Beijing, policymakers are being pressed to rethink how far the UK’s famed openness to foreign capital should stretch. Industry groups and security experts argue that a new wave of bids for British assets – from defence-engineering specialists to data-rich fintechs – is exposing gaps in the current toolkit, where national security reviews are often reactive and fragmented. The challenge, they say, is crafting a framework that preserves the City’s role as a global deal hub while preventing the quiet erosion of capabilities deemed critical to economic resilience and democratic stability.

Behind closed doors, officials are weighing a more coherent risk-based regime, with calls for earlier intervention thresholds, clearer red lines around strategic infrastructure and tighter oversight of opaque ownership structures. Proposals circulating in Westminster and Whitehall include:

  • Mandatory disclosure of ultimate beneficial owners in sensitive deals
  • Sector-specific tests for AI, semiconductors, critical minerals and defence supply chains
  • Time-limited “golden shares” to safeguard jobs, IP and domestic production
  • Enhanced parliamentary scrutiny of high‑risk foreign acquisitions
Sector Risk Focus Possible Measure
Advanced tech IP leakage Export controls
Energy & grid Supply disruption Golden share
Finance & data Data security Data‑localisation rules

Investors advised to hedge Brexit and election risks while positioning for renewed UK dealmaking

Portfolio managers are quietly retooling strategies as Westminster’s election calendar collides with the unresolved fallout from Brexit. Rather than attempting to time political headlines, institutional investors are building layered protection through options on sterling, increased allocations to defensive UK equities, and selective use of inflation-linked gilts. Currency volatility is being treated as both a risk and an entry point, with traders favouring tight stop-losses around key policy announcements. Stress tests now routinely model scenarios such as a minority government,a sharper EU divergence,or a sudden repricing of UK assets if trade negotiations lurch off course.

Simultaneously occurring, deal desks are positioning for a potential resurgence in cross-border M&A once political visibility improves and valuations remain at a discount to global peers. Private equity dry powder, opportunistic US buyers and cash-rich UK corporates are circling sectors seen as structural winners. Current focus areas include:

  • Infrastructure and energy transition – assets with regulated returns and long-term policy support.
  • Healthcare and life sciences – defensive earnings and strong IP portfolios.
  • Financial technology – scalable platforms positioned for regulatory clarity.
  • Logistics and data centres – beneficiaries of e-commerce and AI demand.
Strategy Risk Targeted Dealmaking Angle
GBP options hedging Currency swings Lock-in FX for inbound bids
Shift to defensives Earnings shocks Stable platforms for bolt-ons
Event-driven funds Vote outcomes Capture deal premia

The Way Forward

As the London talks draw to a close,the prospect of a symbolic “handshake” between Washington and Beijing underscores both the fragility and necessity of recalibrating global trade ties. Amid the City’s latest wave of takeovers,the day’s events highlight a financial centre still adept at attracting capital,even as geopolitical tensions and regulatory uncertainty loom large.

Whether these tentative diplomatic gestures translate into lasting accords-and whether the current dealmaking surge signals renewed confidence or a final burst before a downturn-will shape the narrative for markets and policymakers in the months ahead. For now, investors, executives and governments alike are left balancing cautious optimism against the hard realities of a divided global economy.

Related posts

Five Minutes with Jonathan Berman: Insights from a London Business School Expert

Victoria Jones

Meet Snehal: The 2025 MBA Rising Star from London Business School

Caleb Wilson

The Power Shift: How Ukraine Took Control and Turned the Tide Against Russia

Ethan Riley